On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:49:25 +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> Running the eBPF test_verifier leads to random errors looking like this:
>
> [ 6525.735488] Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1
> [ 6525.735502] Internal error: ptrace BRK handler: f2000100 [#1] SMP
> [ 6525.741609] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 cifs libdes libarc4 dns_resolver
> fscache binfmt_misc nls_ascii nls_cp437 vfat fat aes_ce_blk crypto_simd
> cryptd aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce gf128mul efi_pstore sha2_ce sha256_arm64
> sha1_ce evdev efivars efivarfs ip_tables x_tables autofs4 btrfs
> blake2b_generic xor xor_neon zstd_compress raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic
> ahci xhci_pci libahci xhci_hcd igb libata i2c_algo_bit nvme realtek usbcore
> nvme_core scsi_mod t10_pi netsec mdio_devres of_mdio gpio_keys fixed_phy
> libphy gpio_mb86s7x
> [ 6525.787760] CPU: 3 PID: 7881 Comm: test_verifier Tainted: G W
> 5.9.0-rc1+ #47
> [ 6525.796111] Hardware name: Socionext SynQuacer E-series DeveloperBox, BIOS
> build #1 Jun 6 2020
> [ 6525.804812] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--)
> [ 6525.810390] pc : bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4
> [ 6525.815613] lr : bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c
> [ 6525.820832] sp : ffff8000130cbb80
> [ 6525.824141] x29: ffff8000130cbbb0 x28: 0000000000000000
> [ 6525.829451] x27: 000005ef6fcbf39b x26: 0000000000000000
> [ 6525.834759] x25: ffff8000130cbb80 x24: ffff800011dc7038
> [ 6525.840067] x23: ffff8000130cbd00 x22: ffff0008f624d080
> [ 6525.845375] x21: 0000000000000001 x20: ffff800011dc7000
> [ 6525.850682] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000
> [ 6525.855990] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
> [ 6525.861298] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000
> [ 6525.866606] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
> [ 6525.871913] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff8000000a660c
> [ 6525.877220] x9 : ffff800010951810 x8 : ffff8000130cbc38
> [ 6525.882528] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000009864cfa881
> [ 6525.887836] x5 : 00ffffffffffffff x4 : 002880ba1a0b3e9f
> [ 6525.893144] x3 : 0000000000000018 x2 : ffff8000000a4374
> [ 6525.898452] x1 : 000000000000000a x0 : 0000000000000009
> [ 6525.903760] Call trace:
> [ 6525.906202] bpf_prog_c3d01833289b6311_F+0xc8/0x9f4
> [ 6525.911076] bpf_prog_d53bb52e3f4483f9_F+0x38/0xc8c
> [ 6525.915957] bpf_dispatcher_xdp_func+0x14/0x20
> [ 6525.920398] bpf_test_run+0x70/0x1b0
> [ 6525.923969] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0xec/0x190
> [ 6525.928326] __do_sys_bpf+0xc88/0x1b28
> [ 6525.932072] __arm64_sys_bpf+0x24/0x30
> [ 6525.935820] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x70/0x168
> [ 6525.940607] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88
> [ 6525.943920] el0_sync_handler+0x88/0x190
> [ 6525.947838] el0_sync+0x140/0x180
> [ 6525.951154] Code: d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 d4202000 (d4202000)
> [ 6525.957249] ---[ end trace cecc3f93b14927e2 ]---
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!
[1/1] arm64: bpf: Fix branch offset in JIT
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/32f6865c7aa3
--
Catalin
