On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 10:28:12 -0500 Dan Murphy <dmur...@ti.com> wrote:
> Marek > > On 9/16/20 6:16 PM, Marek Behún wrote: > > By using struct led_init_data when registering we do not need to parse > > `label` DT property nor `linux,default-trigger` property. > > > > A small refactor was also done: > > - with using devm_led_classdev_register_ext the driver remove method is > > not needed > > - since only one child node is allowed for this driver, use > > device_get_next_child_node instead of device_for_each_child_node > > > > Previously if the `label` DT property was not present, the code composed > > name for the LED in the form > > "parent_name::" > > For backwards compatibility we therefore set > > init_data->default_label = ":"; > > so that the LED will not get a different name if `label` property is not > > present. > > You are going to re-factor this as well a lot of changes in a single > patch is hard to review > > Dan > I am trying to do this now.
