On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 08:39:34AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 7:26 AM Daniel Jordan > <daniel.m.jor...@oracle.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:37:45AM +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > > > 在 2020/9/16 上午12:58, Daniel Jordan 写道: > > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 01:21:56AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 13 Sep 2020, Alex Shi wrote: > > > >>> Uh, I updated the testing with some new results here: > > > >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/26/212 > > > >> Right, I missed that, that's better, thanks. Any other test results? > > > > Alex, you were doing some will-it-scale runs earlier. Are you planning > > > > to do > > > > more of those? Otherwise I can add them in. > > > > > > Hi Daniel, > > > > > > Does compaction perf scalable, like thpscale, I except they could get > > > some benefit. > > > > Yep, I plan to stress compaction. Reclaim as well. > > > > I should have said which Alex I meant. I was asking Alex Duyck since he'd > > done > > some will-it-scale runs. > > I probably won't be able to do any will-it-scale runs any time soon. > If I recall I ran them for this latest v18 patch set and didn't see > any regressions like I did with the previous set. However the system I > was using is tied up for other purposes and it may be awhile before I > can free it up to look into this again.
Ok, sure. I hadn't seen the regressions were taken case of, that's good to hear. Might still add them to my testing for v19 and beyond, we'll see.
