Am Freitag 16 November 2007 schrieb Maciej W. Rozycki:
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > > > On irq 20, there's an UHCI, on irq 19 is an EHCI. For every interrupt
> > > > on 20
> > > > there's a spurious interrupt on 19. USB devices on bus of the
> > > > controller on 20
> > > > work. So I know all interrupts are seen. ERR does not increase.
> > > > Interrupts
> > > > for devices on the bus of the controller on 19 arrive at 19 only.
> > >
> > > I suggest you try to sort it out with the maintainers of the UHCI and
> > > EHCI drivers then.
> >
> > They are innocent. This laptop really delivers an interrupt twice.
>
> Perhaps, but these drivers are involved and the device-specific knowledge
> will help tracking down the cause. I have general experience on how
> interrupts work, including on APIC-based systems, but I have no idea how
> UHCI and EHCI devices work in this area and, in particular, how you know
> an interrupt coming from the line #19 is related to one on the line #20
> and then a spurious one if not recorded as ERR or otherwise unclaimed
> (which would be reported as "irq 19: nobody cared").
I am getting irq 19:nobody cared. Interrupts on 19 and 20 increase with
same rate, disconnecting the device on the bus stops the increase,
reconnecting it makes them increase again.
Regards
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
