> The patch looks good to me. Which versions of Clang do the trap after > noreturn call? It would be good to have that in the commit message.
I omitted this because it happens with all versions of clang that are supported for building the kernel. clang-9 is the oldest version that could build the mainline x86_64 kernel right now, and it has the same behavior. Should I send a v2 with this info? I.H.
