On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 12:39:28PM -0400 Phil Auld wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 01:42:02PM +0200 [email protected] wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:03:36PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > > Vincent Guittot (4): > > > sched/fair: relax constraint on task's load during load balance > > > sched/fair: reduce minimal imbalance threshold > > > sched/fair: minimize concurrent LBs between domain level > > > sched/fair: reduce busy load balance interval > > > > I see nothing objectionable there, a little more testing can't hurt, but > > I'm tempted to apply them. > > > > Phil, Mel, any chance you can run them through your respective setups? > > > > Sorry for the delay. Things have been backing up... > > We tested with tis series and found there was no performance change in > our test suites. (We don't have a good way to share the actual numbers > outside right now, but since they aren't really different it probably > doesn't matter much here.) > > The difference we did see was a slight decrease in the number of tasks > moved around at higher loads. That seems to be a good thing even though > it didn't directly show time-based performance benefits (and was pretty > minor). > > So if this helps other use cases we've got no problems with it. >
Feel free to add a Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <[email protected]> Jirka did the actual testing so he can speak up with a Tested-by if he wants to. > Thanks, > Phil > > -- > --
