On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 21:58 +0000, Roger Leigh wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm using an Apple Cinema Display connected via DVI to an Apple Mac > Mini with Radeon 9200 graphics. This used to work fine, but with > kernels >= 2.6.19, the monitor powers off as soon as the framebuffer > is initialised, making for a less than usable system. I've tested > with 2.6.(19|2[012]), and I didn't see any related changes in 2.6.23.
.../... Can you try the patch from Jean that I pasted below and let us know if it helps ? It looks like the releasing of the i2c lines may have been done backward. (Also, Michel, can you check if it fixes your other problem with this code ? ie. your "hot crash") Cheers, Ben. -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Antonino Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [PATCH] fb_ddc: Fix DDC lines quirk Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:21:41 +0100 The code in fb_ddc_read() is said to be based on the implementation of the radeon driver: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc5891c8a3ba284f13994d7bc1f1bfa8283982de However, comparing the old radeon driver code with the new fb_ddc code reveals some differences. Most notably, the I2C bus lines are held at the end of the function, while the original code was releasing them (as the comment above correctly says.) There are a few other differences, which appear to be responsible for read failures on my system. While tracing low-level I2C code in i2c-algo-bit, I noticed that the initial attempt to read the EDID always failed. It takes one retry for the read to succeed. As we are about to remove this automatic retry property from i2c-algo-bit, reading the EDID would really fail. As a summary, the I2C lines quirk which is supposedly needed to read EDID on some older monitors is currently breaking the (first) read on all other monitors (and might not even work with older ones - did anyone try since October 2006?) After applying the patch below, which makes the code in fb_ddc_read() really similar to what the radeon driver used to have, the first EDID read succeeds again. On top of that, as it appears that this code has been broken for one year now and nobody seems to have complained, I'm curious if it makes sense to keep this quirk in place. It makes the code more complex and slower just for the sake of monitors which I guess nobody uses anymore. Can't we just get rid of it? Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/video/fb_ddc.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- linux-2.6.24-rc3.orig/drivers/video/fb_ddc.c 2007-11-17 20:23:03.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.24-rc3/drivers/video/fb_ddc.c 2007-11-18 12:49:14.000000000 +0100 @@ -56,13 +56,12 @@ unsigned char *fb_ddc_read(struct i2c_ad int i, j; algo_data->setscl(algo_data->data, 1); - algo_data->setscl(algo_data->data, 0); for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) { /* For some old monitors we need the * following process to initialize/stop DDC */ - algo_data->setsda(algo_data->data, 0); + algo_data->setsda(algo_data->data, 1); msleep(13); algo_data->setscl(algo_data->data, 1); @@ -97,14 +96,15 @@ unsigned char *fb_ddc_read(struct i2c_ad algo_data->setsda(algo_data->data, 1); msleep(15); algo_data->setscl(algo_data->data, 0); + algo_data->setsda(algo_data->data, 0); if (edid) break; } /* Release the DDC lines when done or the Apple Cinema HD display * will switch off */ - algo_data->setsda(algo_data->data, 0); - algo_data->setscl(algo_data->data, 0); + algo_data->setsda(algo_data->data, 1); + algo_data->setscl(algo_data->data, 1); return edid; } - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
