From: Xunlei Pang <xlp...@linux.alibaba.com>
commit e3336cab2579012b1e72b5265adf98e2d6e244ad upstream.
We've met softlockup with "CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y", when the target memcg
doesn't have any reclaimable memory.
It can be easily reproduced as below:
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 111s![memcg_test:2204]
CPU: 0 PID: 2204 Comm: memcg_test Not tainted 5.9.0-rc2+ #12
Call Trace:
shrink_lruvec+0x49f/0x640
shrink_node+0x2a6/0x6f0
do_try_to_free_pages+0xe9/0x3e0
try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages+0xef/0x1f0
try_charge+0x2c1/0x750
mem_cgroup_charge+0xd7/0x240
__add_to_page_cache_locked+0x2fd/0x370
add_to_page_cache_lru+0x4a/0xc0
pagecache_get_page+0x10b/0x2f0
filemap_fault+0x661/0xad0
ext4_filemap_fault+0x2c/0x40
__do_fault+0x4d/0xf9
handle_mm_fault+0x1080/0x1790
It only happens on our 1-vcpu instances, because there's no chance for
oom reaper to run to reclaim the to-be-killed process.
Add a cond_resched() at the upper shrink_node_memcgs() to solve this
issue, this will mean that we will get a scheduling point for each memcg
in the reclaimed hierarchy without any dependency on the reclaimable
memory in that memcg thus making it more predictable.
Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <xlp...@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Chris Down <ch...@chrisdown.name>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <han...@cmpxchg.org>
Link:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1598495549-67324-1-git-send-email-xlp...@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Fixes: b0dedc49a2da ("mm/vmscan.c: iterate only over charged shrinkers during
memcg shrink_slab()")
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Julius Hemanth Pitti <jpi...@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2619,6 +2619,14 @@ static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t
unsigned long reclaimed;
unsigned long scanned;
+ /*
+ * This loop can become CPU-bound when target memcgs
+ * aren't eligible for reclaim - either because they
+ * don't have any reclaimable pages, or because their
+ * memory is explicitly protected. Avoid soft lockups.
+ */
+ cond_resched();
+
switch (mem_cgroup_protected(target_memcg, memcg)) {
case MEMCG_PROT_MIN:
/*
