On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 06:09:51PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> From: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliq...@st.com>
>
> Rename the internal function as it is internal, and as
> the name will be used in rpmsg_core.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliq...@st.com>
> ---
> drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> index 7d7ed4e5cce7..e8d55c8b9cbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> @@ -395,8 +395,9 @@ static void virtio_rpmsg_release_device(struct device
> *dev)
> * this function will be used to create both static and dynamic
> * channels.
> */
> -static struct rpmsg_device *rpmsg_create_channel(struct virtproc_info *vrp,
> - struct rpmsg_channel_info
> *chinfo)
> +static struct rpmsg_device *
> +__rpmsg_create_channel(struct virtproc_info *vrp,
> + struct rpmsg_channel_info *chinfo)
Nitpick: we now have 100 characters, so there's no *need* any more to split
that
line, now it's more a matter of consistent style and personal preference. Most
functions in that file have function type and name on the same line, but a few
also make the split like here... So, we can choose our poison here I guess.
Thanks
Guennadi
> {
> struct virtio_rpmsg_channel *vch;
> struct rpmsg_device *rpdev;
> @@ -869,7 +870,7 @@ static int rpmsg_ns_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void
> *data, int len,
> if (ret)
> dev_err(dev, "rpmsg_destroy_channel failed: %d\n", ret);
> } else {
> - newch = rpmsg_create_channel(vrp, &chinfo);
> + newch = __rpmsg_create_channel(vrp, &chinfo);
> if (!newch)
> dev_err(dev, "rpmsg_create_channel failed\n");
> }
> --
> 2.25.1
>
