Phil Auld <pa...@redhat.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 02:54:01PM +0800 Huang Ying wrote:
>> Now, AutoNUMA can only optimize the page placement among the NUMA nodes if 
>> the
>> default memory policy is used.  Because the memory policy specified 
>> explicitly
>> should take precedence.  But this seems too strict in some situations.  For
>> example, on a system with 4 NUMA nodes, if the memory of an application is 
>> bound
>> to the node 0 and 1, AutoNUMA can potentially migrate the pages between the 
>> node
>> 0 and 1 to reduce cross-node accessing without breaking the explicit memory
>> binding policy.
>> 
>> So in this patch, if mbind(.mode=MPOL_BIND, .flags=MPOL_MF_LAZY) is used to 
>> bind
>> the memory of the application to multiple nodes, and in the hint page fault
>> handler both the faulting page node and the accessing node are in the policy
>> nodemask, the page will be tried to be migrated to the accessing node to 
>> reduce
>> the cross-node accessing.
>>
>
> Do you have any performance numbers that show the effects of this on
> a workload?

I have done some simple test to confirm that NUMA balancing works in the
target configuration.

As for performance numbers, it's exactly same as that of the original
NUMA balancing in a different configuration.  Between without memory
binding and with memory bound to all NUMA nodes.

>
>> [Peter Zijlstra: provided the simplified implementation method.]
>> 
>> Questions:
>> 
>> Sysctl knob kernel.numa_balancing can enable/disable AutoNUMA optimizing
>> globally.  But for the memory areas that are bound to multiple NUMA nodes, 
>> even
>> if the AutoNUMA is enabled globally via the sysctl knob, we still need to 
>> enable
>> AutoNUMA again with a special flag.  Why not just optimize the page 
>> placement if
>> possible as long as AutoNUMA is enabled globally?  The interface would look
>> simpler with that.
>
>
> I agree. I think it should try to do this if globally enabled.

Thanks!

>> 
>> Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.hu...@intel.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgor...@suse.de>
>> Cc: Rik van Riel <r...@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Johannes Weiner <han...@cmpxchg.org>
>> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <wi...@infradead.org>
>> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@intel.com>
>> Cc: Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
>> Cc: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com>
>> ---
>>  mm/mempolicy.c | 17 +++++++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
>> index eddbe4e56c73..273969204732 100644
>> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
>> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
>> @@ -2494,15 +2494,19 @@ int mpol_misplaced(struct page *page, struct 
>> vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long
>>              break;
>>  
>>      case MPOL_BIND:
>> -
>>              /*
>> -             * allows binding to multiple nodes.
>> -             * use current page if in policy nodemask,
>> -             * else select nearest allowed node, if any.
>> -             * If no allowed nodes, use current [!misplaced].
>> +             * Allows binding to multiple nodes.  If both current and
>> +             * accessing nodes are in policy nodemask, migrate to
>> +             * accessing node to optimize page placement. Otherwise,
>> +             * use current page if in policy nodemask, else select
>> +             * nearest allowed node, if any.  If no allowed nodes, use
>> +             * current [!misplaced].
>>               */
>> -            if (node_isset(curnid, pol->v.nodes))
>> +            if (node_isset(curnid, pol->v.nodes)) {
>> +                    if (node_isset(thisnid, pol->v.nodes))
>> +                            goto moron;
>
> Nice label :)

OK.  Because quite some people pay attention to this.  I will rename all
"moron" to "mopron" as suggested by Matthew.  Although MPOL_F_MORON is
defined in include/uapi/linux/mempolicy.h, it is explicitly marked as
internal flags.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

>>                      goto out;
>> +            }
>>              z = first_zones_zonelist(
>>                              node_zonelist(numa_node_id(), GFP_HIGHUSER),
>>                              gfp_zone(GFP_HIGHUSER),
>> @@ -2516,6 +2520,7 @@ int mpol_misplaced(struct page *page, struct 
>> vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long
>>  
>>      /* Migrate the page towards the node whose CPU is referencing it */
>>      if (pol->flags & MPOL_F_MORON) {
>> +moron:
>>              polnid = thisnid;
>>  
>>              if (!should_numa_migrate_memory(current, page, curnid, thiscpu))
>> -- 
>> 2.28.0
>> 
>
>
> Cheers,
> Phil

Reply via email to