On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 09:30:03AM +0200, pet...@infradead.org wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 06:44:12AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 6:36 AM Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au>
> > wrote:
> > > > (k-slock-AF_INET6){+.-.}-{2:2}
>
> That's a seqlock.
Are you sure? Line 2503 in net/ipv4/tcp.c says
bh_lock_sock(sk);
> Did that tree you're testing include 267580db047e ("seqlock: Unbreak
> lockdep") ?
According to
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c32502fd255cb3a44048
the git tree used was
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/include?id=5fa35f247b563a7893f3f68f19d00ace2ccf3dff
so no it doesn't contain that patch.
Hopefully this would address those seqlock backtraces. But what
about this particular one which is caused by the socket lock?
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
