On 20-09-24 13:09:05, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 23.09.2020, 17:48 +0300 schrieb Petko Manolov:
>
> > One possible fix is to add yet another argument to usb_control_msg_recv(),
> > which would be the GFP_XYZ flag to pass on to kmemdup(). Up to Greg, of
> > course.
>
> submitted. The problem is those usages that are very hard to trace. I'd
> dislike to just slab GFP_NOIO on them for no obvious reason.
Do you mean you submitted a patch for usb_control_msg_recv() (because i don't
see it on linux-netdev) or i'm reading this all wrong?
Petko
