On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Andi Kleen wrote: > I might be pointing out the obvious, but on x86-64 there is definitely not > 256TB of VM available for this.
Well maybe in the future. One of the issues that I ran into is that I had to place the cpu area in between to make the offsets link right. However, it would be best if the cpuarea came *after* the modules area. We only need linking that covers the per cpu area of processor 0. So I think we have a 2GB area right? 1GB kernel 1GB - 1x per cpu area (128M?) modules? cpu aree 0 ---- 2GB limit cpu area 1 cpu area 2 .... For that we would need to move the kernel down a bit. Can we do that? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/