On 25/09/2020 12:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:12:09AM +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > >> I get this when running 6 (periodic) RT50 tasks with CPU hp stress on my >> 6 CPU JUNO board (!CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT). >> >> [ 55.490263] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> [ 55.505261] Modules linked in: >> [ 55.508322] CPU: 3 PID: 24 Comm: migration/3 Not tainted >> 5.9.0-rc1-00132-gc096e6406c50-dirty #90 >> [ 55.517119] Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r0) (DT) >> [ 55.523058] Stopper: multi_cpu_stop+0x0/0x170 <- 0x0 >> [ 55.528029] pstate: 20000085 (nzCv daIf -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) >> [ 55.533612] pc : sched_cpu_dying+0x124/0x130 >> [ 55.537887] lr : sched_cpu_dying+0xd8/0x130 >> [ 55.542071] sp : ffff800011f0bca0 >> [ 55.545385] x29: ffff800011f0bca0 x28: 0000000000000002 >> [ 55.550703] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000060 >> [ 55.556022] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000001 >> [ 55.561340] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000003 >> [ 55.566659] x21: 0000000000000080 x20: 0000000000000003 >> [ 55.571977] x19: ffff00097ef9e1c0 x18: 0000000000000010 >> [ 55.577295] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 >> [ 55.582613] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 000000000000015c >> [ 55.587932] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 00000000000006f1 >> [ 55.593250] x11: 0000000000000080 x10: 0000000000000000 >> [ 55.598567] x9 : 0000000000000003 x8 : ffff0009743f5900 >> [ 55.603886] x7 : 0000000000000003 x6 : 0000000000000000 >> [ 55.609204] x5 : 0000000000000001 x4 : 0000000000000002 >> [ 55.614521] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000013 >> [ 55.619839] x1 : 0000000000000008 x0 : 0000000000000003 >> [ 55.625158] Call trace: >> [ 55.627607] sched_cpu_dying+0x124/0x130 >> [ 55.631535] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x88/0x210 >> [ 55.635897] take_cpu_down+0x7c/0xd8 >> [ 55.639475] multi_cpu_stop+0xac/0x170 >> [ 55.643227] cpu_stopper_thread+0x98/0x130 >> [ 55.647327] smpboot_thread_fn+0x1c4/0x280 >> [ 55.651427] kthread+0x140/0x160 >> [ 55.654658] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x34 >> [ 55.658239] Code: f000e1c1 913fc021 1400034a 17ffffde (d4210000) >> [ 55.664342] ---[ end trace c5b8988b7b701e56 ]--- >> [ 55.668963] note: migration/3[24] exited with preempt_count 3 >> >> 7309 int sched_cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu) >> ... >> BUG_ON(rq->nr_running != 1 || rq_has_pinned_tasks(rq)); >> ... >> >> rq->nr_running is always 2 here in this cases. >> >> balance_hotplug_wait and sched_cpu_wait_empty run in cpuhp/X (CFS) >> whereas sched_cpu_dying in migration/X ? > > takedown_cpu() has: > > kthread_park(per_cpu_ptr(&cpuhp_state, cpu)->thread); > > before calling: > > err = stop_machine_cpuslocked(take_cpu_down, NULL, cpumask_of(cpu)); > > So when we get to sched_cpu_dying(), the only task that _should_ still > be there is migration/X. > > Do you have any idea what thread, other than migration/X, is still > active on that CPU? per sched_cpu_wait_empty() we should've pushed out > all userspace tasks, and the cpu hotplug machinery should've put all the > per-cpu kthreads to sleep at this point.
With Valentin's print_rq() inspired test snippet I always see one of the RT user tasks as the second guy? BTW, it has to be RT tasks, never triggered with CFS tasks. [ 57.849268] CPU2 nr_running=2 [ 57.852241] p=migration/2 [ 57.854967] p=task0-0
