From: Bill Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:16:07 -0500
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote: > > > 2. What's about your suggestion, I thought about this and I am going to > > agree. > > > > Arguments, which convinced me are: > > > > - arping still works. > > - any piece of reasonable software should work. > > - if Windows understands DaD (is it really true? I cannot believe) > > and it is unhappy about our responce and does not block use > > of duplicate address only due to this, we _must_ accomodate ASAP. > > - if we do,we have to use 0 protocol address, no choice. > > I agree the target protocol address should be 0 in this case. Patches, someone :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/