On 23/09/20 20:44, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> +bool __vmx_guest_state_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> -     if (enable_unrestricted_guest)
> -             return true;
> -
>       /* real mode guest state checks */
>       if (!is_protmode(vcpu) || (vmx_get_rflags(vcpu) & X86_EFLAGS_VM)) {
>               if (!rmode_segment_valid(vcpu, VCPU_SREG_CS))
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> index d7ec66db5eb8..e147f180350f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> @@ -343,6 +343,15 @@ void vmx_get_segment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct 
> kvm_segment *var, int seg);
>  void vmx_set_segment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_segment *var, int 
> seg);
>  u64 construct_eptp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long root_hpa,
>                  int root_level);
> +
> +bool __vmx_guest_state_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +static inline bool vmx_guest_state_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +     if (enable_unrestricted_guest)
> +             return true;
> +
> +     return __vmx_guest_state_valid(vcpu);

This is now "if (is_unrestricted_guest (vcpu))", but the patch otherwise
applies.

Paolo

Reply via email to