-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Eric Dumazet wrote: > I am wondering if some parts are missing from your ChangeLog > > You apparently added in v3 a new 'flags' parameter to indirect syscall > but no trace of this change in Changelog, and why it was added. This > seems to imply a future multiplexor.
This was mentioned in one of my mails. I added the parameter to accommodate Linus's and Zack's idea to use the functionality for syslets as well. Not really a multiplexer, it is meant to be a "execute synchronously or asynchronously" flag. In the latter case an additional parameter might be needed to indicate the notification mechanism. > And no change in the test program reflecting this 'flags' new param, so > it fails. Yep, sorry, I didn't update the text by including the most recent test program. I'll do that for the next version. - -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHQwca2ijCOnn/RHQRAgQJAKDH+N3+FSJ0kD5VbzbAFN4918wREwCePHbc nSY/t9x1FuYstYDaaT6Kut0= =c95e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
