On Sun, 2020-09-27 at 21:49 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bige...@linutronix.de> > > The usage of in_interrupt) in driver code is phased out. > > The iwlwifi_dbg tracepoint records in_interrupt() seperately, but that's > superfluous because the trace header already records all kind of state and > context information like hardirq status, softirq status, preemption count > etc. > > Aside of that the recording of in_interrupt() as boolean does not allow to > distinguish between the possible contexts (hard interrupt, soft interrupt, > bottom half disabled) while the trace header gives precise information. > > Remove the duplicate information from the tracepoint and fixup the caller. > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bige...@linutronix.de> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> > Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.b...@intel.com> > Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumb...@intel.com> > Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coe...@intel.com> > Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxw...@intel.com> > Cc: Kalle Valo <kv...@codeaurora.org> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net> > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org> > Cc: linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org > Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Luca Coelho <l...@coelho.fi> -- Luca.
