Hi Grygorii,
On 30/09/2020 16.56, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>
>
> On 28/09/2020 11:34, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> It's JTAG PARTNO is 0xBB38.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfal...@ti.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
>> index bbbc2d2b7091..a14ec68846dd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
>> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ static const struct k3_soc_id {
>> { 0xBB5A, "AM65X" },
>> { 0xBB64, "J721E" },
>> { 0xBB6D, "J7200" },
>> + { 0xBB38, "AM64" }
>
> Shouldn't it be AM64X
Good point, I'll fix this up and then the DMA series.
While here, what do you think: should we keep the DMA compatibles as I
have them in v1 (am64-dmss-bcdma and am64-dmss-pktdma):
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200930091412.8020-10-peter.ujfal...@ti.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200930091412.8020-11-peter.ujfal...@ti.com/
or change them to am64x-dmss-* ?
I'll ask Rob on the binding doc patches as well.
>
>> };
>> static int
>>
>
- Péter
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
