Andrew Morton пишет:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 01:49:19 +0300
> Dmitri Vorobiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Zach Brown пишет:
>>>>> This doesn't look fine. Did you test this?
>>>> Oops, my fault. Of course, I tested the patch, but kernel modules are
>>>> disabled in my test setup, so I missed the error.
>>> :)
>>>
>>>> Enclosed to this message is a new patch, which replaces the goto-loop by
>>>> the while-based one, but leaves the EXPORT_SYMBOL macro intact.
>>> It certainly looks OK to me now, for whatever that's worth.
>> Zach, thank you for the code review and suggestions.
>>
>>> You probably want to wait 'till the next merge window to get it in,
>>> though. It's just a cleanup and so shouldn't go in this late in the -rc
>>> line.
>>>
>>> Maybe Andrew will be willing to queue it until that time in -mm.
>> I am enclosing the patch against current -mm tree and adding Andrew to the
>> Cc: list.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Dmitri
>>
>>> - z
>>>
>>
> [loop-cleanup-fs-namespace-mm.diff text/x-patch (742B)]
> Signed-off-by: Dmitri Vorobiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
> index 79883fe..b098b63 100644
> --- a/fs/namespace.c
> +++ b/fs/namespace.c
> @@ -606,19 +606,17 @@ static inline void __mntput(struct vfsmo
>
> void mntput_no_expire(struct vfsmount *mnt)
> {
> -repeat:
> - if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&mnt->mnt_count, &vfsmount_lock)) {
> + while (atomic_dec_and_lock(&mnt->mnt_count, &vfsmount_lock)) {
> if (likely(!mnt->mnt_pinned)) {
> spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
> __mntput(mnt);
> - return;
> + break;
> }
> atomic_add(mnt->mnt_pinned + 1, &mnt->mnt_count);
> mnt->mnt_pinned = 0;
> spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
> acct_auto_close_mnt(mnt);
> security_sb_umount_close(mnt);
> - goto repeat;
> }
> }
>
> This patch has no changelog which I can use.
>
>
Andrew, thanks for the quick reply. I believe that a couple of sentences is
enough for the changelog entry, so here it goes...
From: Dmitri Vorobiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The mntput_no_expire() routine implements a simple loop using the goto-based
construct. Replace this with an equivalent while-based loop, which looks much
cleaner in C code.
Signed-off-by: Dmitri Vorobiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
index 79883fe..b098b63 100644
--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -606,19 +606,17 @@ static inline void __mntput(struct vfsmo
void mntput_no_expire(struct vfsmount *mnt)
{
-repeat:
- if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&mnt->mnt_count, &vfsmount_lock)) {
+ while (atomic_dec_and_lock(&mnt->mnt_count, &vfsmount_lock)) {
if (likely(!mnt->mnt_pinned)) {
spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
__mntput(mnt);
- return;
+ break;
}
atomic_add(mnt->mnt_pinned + 1, &mnt->mnt_count);
mnt->mnt_pinned = 0;
spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
acct_auto_close_mnt(mnt);
security_sb_umount_close(mnt);
- goto repeat;
}
}
