On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote: > > I told you that I have the new code that is scheduled for 2.5 certified on > analizers to be technically correct as it relates to the "state diagrams" > in the standard. "Technically correct" and "state diagrams as in the standard" mean less that nothing to me. They have very little to do with the concept of "working", which is all I really personally care about. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Bryan O'Sullivan
- Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Linus Torvalds
- Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Alan Cox
- Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch John Heil
- Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Linus Torvalds
- Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch John Heil
- Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Linus Torvalds
- Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Matthias Andree
- Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Andre Hedrick
- Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Linus Torvalds
- Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Andre Hedrick
- Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Linus Torvalds
- Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Andre Hedrick
- Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Andre Hedrick
- Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Alan Cox
- Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Andre Hedrick
- Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch TimO
- Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Vojtech Pavlik