On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 10:09:22AM +1100, David Chinner wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:29:09AM +1100, David Chinner wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 12:10:29PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote: > > > If I've got XFS on filesystems A and B on the same spindle (or volume > > > group?) and my real RT I/O takes place only on B, then I want log > > > flushing to happen in RT on B. But -never on A-. If I can do this with > > > a tunable, I'm perfectly happy. > > > > No, not another mount option. I'm just going to drop this one for > > now... > > Actually, I might change it to use the highest non-rt priority, which > would solve the latency issues in the normal cases and still leave > the RT rope dangling for those that want to use it. > > Is that an acceptible compromise, Matt?
Yes, that's perfectly fine. -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/