On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:36:52 +1100 Jeremy Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This change allows force_sig_info to be called from modules. > > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- > > Any objections to exporting this symbol? I'm planning to move some > SPU fault-handling code from the kernel to the spufs.ko object. > > --- > > kernel/signal.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > Index: linux-2.6-spufs/kernel/signal.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6-spufs.orig/kernel/signal.c > +++ linux-2.6-spufs/kernel/signal.c > @@ -815,6 +815,7 @@ force_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo * > > return ret; > } > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(force_sig_info); > > void > force_sig_specific(int sig, struct task_struct *t) Perhaps export it from within a powerpc-specific C file (along with suitable comment) to prevent people from generally relying upon the export? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
