Hi Hector,

On 10/8/20 1:13 PM, Hector Yuan wrote:
From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.y...@mediatek.com>

Register CPU power table to energy model framework

Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.y...@mediatek.com>
---
  drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c |   50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c 
b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c
index 8fa12e5..3808ea0 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include <linux/bitfield.h>
  #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
+#include <linux/energy_model.h>
  #include <linux/init.h>
  #include <linux/kernel.h>
  #include <linux/module.h>
@@ -17,9 +18,10 @@
  #define LUT_ROW_SIZE                  0x4
enum {
-       REG_LUT_TABLE,
-       REG_ENABLE,
-       REG_PERF_STATE,
+       REG_FREQ_LUT_TABLE,
+       REG_FREQ_ENABLE,
+       REG_FREQ_PERF_STATE,
+       REG_EM_POWER_TBL,
REG_ARRAY_SIZE,
  };
@@ -27,23 +29,44 @@ enum {
  struct cpufreq_mtk {
        struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table;
        void __iomem *reg_bases[REG_ARRAY_SIZE];
+       int nr_opp;
        cpumask_t related_cpus;
  };
static const u16 cpufreq_mtk_offsets[REG_ARRAY_SIZE] = {
-       [REG_LUT_TABLE]         = 0x0,
-       [REG_ENABLE]            = 0x84,
-       [REG_PERF_STATE]        = 0x88,
+       [REG_FREQ_LUT_TABLE]    = 0x0,
+       [REG_FREQ_ENABLE]       = 0x84,
+       [REG_FREQ_PERF_STATE]   = 0x88,
+       [REG_EM_POWER_TBL]      = 0x3D0,
  };
static struct cpufreq_mtk *mtk_freq_domain_map[NR_CPUS]; +static int mtk_cpufreq_get_cpu_power(unsigned long *mW,
+                                    unsigned long *KHz, int cpu)
+{
+       struct cpufreq_mtk *c = mtk_freq_domain_map[cpu];
+       int i;
+
+       for (i = 0; i < c->nr_opp; i++) {
+               if (c->table[i].frequency < *KHz)
+                       break;
+       }
+       i--;
+
+       *KHz = c->table[i].frequency;
+       *mW = readl_relaxed(c->reg_bases[REG_EM_POWER_TBL] +
+                           i * LUT_ROW_SIZE) / 1000;
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
  static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
                                       unsigned int index)
  {
        struct cpufreq_mtk *c = policy->driver_data;
- writel_relaxed(index, c->reg_bases[REG_PERF_STATE]);
+       writel_relaxed(index, c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_PERF_STATE]);
return 0;
  }
@@ -55,7 +78,7 @@ static unsigned int mtk_cpufreq_hw_get(unsigned int cpu)
c = mtk_freq_domain_map[cpu]; - index = readl_relaxed(c->reg_bases[REG_PERF_STATE]);
+       index = readl_relaxed(c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_PERF_STATE]);
        index = min(index, LUT_MAX_ENTRIES - 1);
return c->table[index].frequency;
@@ -64,6 +87,7 @@ static unsigned int mtk_cpufreq_hw_get(unsigned int cpu)
  static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
  {
        struct cpufreq_mtk *c;
+       struct em_data_callback em_cb = EM_DATA_CB(mtk_cpufreq_get_cpu_power);
c = mtk_freq_domain_map[policy->cpu];
        if (!c) {
@@ -77,7 +101,8 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy 
*policy)
        policy->driver_data = c;
/* HW should be in enabled state to proceed now */
-       writel_relaxed(0x1, c->reg_bases[REG_ENABLE]);
+       writel_relaxed(0x1, c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_ENABLE]);
+       em_register_perf_domain(policy->cpus, c->nr_opp, &em_cb);


The function name has changed recently (v5.9-rc1) to:
em_dev_register_perf_domain()

Please check your base kernel tree and update.

Regards,
Lukasz

Reply via email to