On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 8:27 PM Harshal Chaudhari
<harshalcha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Checking the argument passed to the ioctl is valid
> or not. if not then return -EINVAL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Harshal Chaudhari <harshalcha...@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/ppdev.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ppdev.c b/drivers/char/ppdev.c
> index 38b46c7d1737..001392980202 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ppdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ppdev.c
> @@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ static int pp_do_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int
> cmd, unsigned long arg)
> unsigned int minor = iminor(file_inode(file));
> struct pp_struct *pp = file->private_data;
> struct parport *port;
> - void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg;
> + void __user *argp = NULL;
> struct ieee1284_info *info;
> unsigned char reg;
> unsigned char mask;
Assigning to NULL serves no purpose here.
> @@ -364,6 +364,16 @@ static int pp_do_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int
> cmd, unsigned long arg)
> struct timespec64 ts;
> int ret;
>
> + if (_IOC_TYPE(cmd) != PP_IOCTL)
> + return -ENOTTY;
This looks correct but is normally done as a "default" case
> + /* check if ioctl argument is present and valid */
> + if (_IOC_DIR(cmd) != _IOC_NONE) {
> + argp = (void __user *)arg;
> + if (!argp)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
This is a change in behavior, it changes the return code from the correct
-EFAULT to an unusual -EINVAL for the special case that the pointer
is NULL compared to other invalid pointers.
Arnd
