+Abhimanyu, Ioana, Fabio
On 10/11/2020 1:36 PM, Jim Quinlan wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 2:53 PM Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
Hi Naresh,
Just adding Christoph and Jim to cc]
On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 19:26:24 +0530 Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamb...@linaro.org>
wrote:
On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 at 19:24, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamb...@linaro.org> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 15:26, Joerg Roedel <j...@8bytes.org> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:36:47AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
Yes, the issue was introduced by one of the changes in "dma-mapping:
introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset", so it only existed in
the dma-mapping/for-next branch anyway.
FYI,
The reported problem still exists on 5.9.0-rc8-next-20201009.
[ 1.843814] Driver must set ecc.strength when using hardware ECC
[ 1.849847] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 1 at
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c:5687 nand_scan_with_ids+0x1450/0x1470
[ 1.859676] Modules linked in:
[ 1.862730] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
5.9.0-rc8-next-20201009 #1
[ 1.870125] Hardware name: Freescale Layerscape 2088A RDB Board (DT)
[ 1.876478] pstate: 40000005 (nZcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
[ 1.882483] pc : nand_scan_with_ids+0x1450/0x1470
[ 1.887183] lr : nand_scan_with_ids+0x1450/0x1470
Hi,
I'm having a hard time coming up with a theory regarding how a commit
concerning DMA offsets can affect the operation of a NAND driver that
appears not to use DMA or the dma-ranges property. Does anyone else
have some ideas, or is there perhaps someone familiar with this test
configuration that I can correspond with to get to the bottom of the
warning?
I believe you are given only a partial warning and just a glimpse of the
thread here which is why understanding the connection to the dma ranges
parsing is not clear. The start of the thread can be found here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ca+g9fyvuq58q+gswnzni0skshbubuqz-uak3tasx26v_a7y...@mail.gmail.com/
Robin indicated that the IOMMU probe failure was fixed with:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/daedc9364a19dc07487e4d07b8768b1e5934abd4.1600700881.git.robin.mur...@arm.com/T/#u
which is confirmed with the new log from Naresh:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20201009/testrun/3284876/suite/linux-log-parser/test/check-kernel-warning-92014/log
however the NAND warning still remains. Someone else familiar with these
NXP development boards should fix the DTS so as to provide the require
ECC strength property.
--
Florian
