Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Monday, 19 of November 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I think that this worked before:
>>>
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/proc# find . -name "timer_info"
>>> find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for ./net: this may be a bug
>>> in your filesystem driver. Automatically turning on find's -noleaf
>>> option. Earlier results may have failed to include directories that
>>> should have been searched.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/proc#
>>
>> I'm seeing that too.
>
> I have a better things with 2.6.24-rc3 ;)
>
> # cd /proc/net
> # ls ..
> ls: reading directory ..: Not a directory
>
> and this
>
> # cd /proc
> # find
> ...
> ./net
> find: . changed during execution of find
> # find net
> find: net changed during execution of find
> # find net/
> <this works ok however>
>
> Moreover. Program that opens /proc/net and dumps the /proc/self/fd
> files produces the following:
>
> # cd /
> # a.out /proc/net
> ...
> lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Nov 20 18:02 3 -> /proc/net/net (deleted)
> ...
> # cd /proc/net
> # a.out .
> ...
> lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Nov 20 18:03 3 -> /proc/net/net (deleted)
> ...
> # a.out ..
> ...
> lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Nov 20 18:03 3 -> /proc/net
> ...
Well I clearly goofed when I added the initial network namespace support
for /proc/net. Currently things work but there are odd details visible
to user space, even when we have a single network namespace.
Since we do not cache proc_dir_entry dentries at the moment we can
just modify ->lookup to return a different directory inode depending
on the network namespace of the process looking at /proc/net, replacing
the current technique of using a magic and fragile follow_link method.
To accomplish that this patch:
- introduces a shadow_proc method to allow different dentries to
be returned from proc_lookup.
- Removes the old /proc/net follow_link magic
- Fixes a weakness in our not caching of proc generic dentries.
As shadow_proc uses a task struct to decided which dentry to return we
can go back later and fix the proc generic caching without modifying any code
that
uses the shadow_proc method.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/proc/generic.c | 12 ++++++-
fs/proc/proc_net.c | 86 +++--------------------------------------------
include/linux/proc_fs.h | 3 ++
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/generic.c b/fs/proc/generic.c
index a9806bc..c2b7523 100644
--- a/fs/proc/generic.c
+++ b/fs/proc/generic.c
@@ -374,9 +374,16 @@ static int proc_delete_dentry(struct dentry * dentry)
return 1;
}
+static int proc_revalidate_dentry(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd)
+{
+ d_drop(dentry);
+ return 0;
+}
+
static struct dentry_operations proc_dentry_operations =
{
.d_delete = proc_delete_dentry,
+ .d_revalidate = proc_revalidate_dentry,
};
/*
@@ -397,8 +404,11 @@ struct dentry *proc_lookup(struct inode * dir, struct
dentry *dentry, struct nam
if (de->namelen != dentry->d_name.len)
continue;
if (!memcmp(dentry->d_name.name, de->name,
de->namelen)) {
- unsigned int ino = de->low_ino;
+ unsigned int ino;
+ if (de->shadow_proc)
+ de = de->shadow_proc(current, de);
+ ino = de->low_ino;
de_get(de);
spin_unlock(&proc_subdir_lock);
error = -EINVAL;
diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_net.c b/fs/proc/proc_net.c
index 131f9c6..0afe21e 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_net.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_net.c
@@ -50,89 +50,14 @@ struct net *get_proc_net(const struct inode *inode)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_proc_net);
-static struct proc_dir_entry *proc_net_shadow;
+static struct proc_dir_entry *shadow_pde;
-static struct dentry *proc_net_shadow_dentry(struct dentry *parent,
+static struct proc_dir_entry *proc_net_shadow(struct task_struct *task,
struct proc_dir_entry *de)
{
- struct dentry *shadow = NULL;
- struct inode *inode;
- if (!de)
- goto out;
- de_get(de);
- inode = proc_get_inode(parent->d_inode->i_sb, de->low_ino, de);
- if (!inode)
- goto out_de_put;
- shadow = d_alloc_name(parent, de->name);
- if (!shadow)
- goto out_iput;
- shadow->d_op = parent->d_op; /* proc_dentry_operations */
- d_instantiate(shadow, inode);
-out:
- return shadow;
-out_iput:
- iput(inode);
-out_de_put:
- de_put(de);
- goto out;
-}
-
-static void *proc_net_follow_link(struct dentry *parent, struct nameidata *nd)
-{
- struct net *net = current->nsproxy->net_ns;
- struct dentry *shadow;
- shadow = proc_net_shadow_dentry(parent, net->proc_net);
- if (!shadow)
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
-
- dput(nd->dentry);
- /* My dentry count is 1 and that should be enough as the
- * shadow dentry is thrown away immediately.
- */
- nd->dentry = shadow;
- return NULL;
+ return task->nsproxy->net_ns->proc_net;
}
-static struct dentry *proc_net_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
- struct nameidata *nd)
-{
- struct net *net = current->nsproxy->net_ns;
- struct dentry *shadow;
-
- shadow = proc_net_shadow_dentry(nd->dentry, net->proc_net);
- if (!shadow)
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
-
- dput(nd->dentry);
- nd->dentry = shadow;
-
- return shadow->d_inode->i_op->lookup(shadow->d_inode, dentry, nd);
-}
-
-static int proc_net_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *iattr)
-{
- struct net *net = current->nsproxy->net_ns;
- struct dentry *shadow;
- int ret;
-
- shadow = proc_net_shadow_dentry(dentry->d_parent, net->proc_net);
- if (!shadow)
- return -ENOENT;
- ret = shadow->d_inode->i_op->setattr(shadow, iattr);
- dput(shadow);
- return ret;
-}
-
-static const struct file_operations proc_net_dir_operations = {
- .read = generic_read_dir,
-};
-
-static struct inode_operations proc_net_dir_inode_operations = {
- .follow_link = proc_net_follow_link,
- .lookup = proc_net_lookup,
- .setattr = proc_net_setattr,
-};
-
static __net_init int proc_net_ns_init(struct net *net)
{
struct proc_dir_entry *root, *netd, *net_statd;
@@ -185,9 +110,8 @@ static struct pernet_operations __net_initdata
proc_net_ns_ops = {
int __init proc_net_init(void)
{
- proc_net_shadow = proc_mkdir("net", NULL);
- proc_net_shadow->proc_iops = &proc_net_dir_inode_operations;
- proc_net_shadow->proc_fops = &proc_net_dir_operations;
+ shadow_pde = proc_mkdir("net", NULL);
+ shadow_pde->shadow_proc = proc_net_shadow;
return register_pernet_subsys(&proc_net_ns_ops);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/proc_fs.h b/include/linux/proc_fs.h
index b070b3b..a5d22c1 100644
--- a/include/linux/proc_fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/proc_fs.h
@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ typedef int (read_proc_t)(char *page, char **start,
off_t off,
typedef int (write_proc_t)(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
unsigned long count, void *data);
typedef int (get_info_t)(char *, char **, off_t, int);
+typedef struct proc_dir_entry *(shadow_proc_t)(struct task_struct *task,
+ struct proc_dir_entry *pde);
struct proc_dir_entry {
unsigned int low_ino;
@@ -79,6 +81,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry {
int pde_users; /* number of callers into module in progress */
spinlock_t pde_unload_lock; /* proc_fops checks and pde_users bumps */
struct completion *pde_unload_completion;
+ shadow_proc_t *shadow_proc;
};
struct kcore_list {
--
1.5.3.rc6.17.g1911
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
