On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 at 17:58, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.ho...@arm.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 02:33:41PM +0200, Etienne Carriere wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 at 23:08, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.ho...@arm.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 04:37:20PM +0200, Etienne Carriere wrote: > > > > Fix dependencies for configuration switch ARM_SCMI_PROTOCOL that > > > > is not exclusively dependent on MAILBOX since the alternate > > > > smc transport that is depends on HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY since [1]. > > > > > > > > > > Do you need any build issues ? I don't see why this is needed. > > > > > > > This change is for consistency of the kernel configuration. > > Without this change, a kernel configured without CONFIG_MAILBOX > > cannot embed SCMI support even is using only the SMC transport > > enabled thanks to HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY. > > > > Fair enough, however instead of adding to the list for each added transport > we need to do better transport abstraction now that we have multiple. > I don't see this as critical, let me know if you disagree.
Not critical, I agree :) etienne > > -- > Regards, > Sudeep