On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 07:50:57AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > Add a selftest for SGX. It is a trivial test where a simple enclave > copies one 64-bit word of memory between two memory locations. > > Cc: Shuah Khan <sh...@kernel.org> > Cc: linux-kselft...@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakki...@linux.intel.com>
Greg, speaking of dual licensing, I'd make an expection with this selftest to what we agreed in the last week. It's the only compact C-only example that I'm aware of that shows how to put together the basics of an SGX user space. Here a more permissive licensing would make sense in my opinion just to give a seed for alternatives. Right now the user space implementations are either in C++ and Rust, and they work great for big things like containers etc. I could envision someone to have something more minimalistic to do something simple for lets say a system daemon. I've done a similar decision with tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/tpm2.py in the past. What do you think? /Jarkko
