Hi! > >>> I.e.: it looks like I will lose some funcionality when I disable > >>> SND_HDA_CODEC_REALTEK. > >> > >> OK. At present you can't have it both ways, i.e., SND_HDA_CODEC_REALTEK > >> with no LEDS. That driver apparently wants LEDS. > > > > Thanks but why have I gone for years without LEDS? > > I do not need LEDS, I do not want LEDS, I do not have LEDS (that are > > visible, usable, etc). > > > > Please make this selectable instead of forcing more bulk into my >> kernel.
LED core is not that big, and this avoided some rather "interesting"
hacks IIRC. If Udo wants more config complexity, lets first make him
measure the benefits, second submit a patch.
But I'd suggest to just live with it.
And yes, we should probably get rid of "CONFIG_NEW_LEDS" symbol. That
one is actually useless.
Best regards,
Pavel
> and this Kconfig entry:
>
> config SND_HDA_CODEC_REALTEK
> tristate "Build Realtek HD-audio codec support"
> select SND_HDA_GENERIC
> select SND_HDA_GENERIC_LEDS
>
> it seems that LED support is not always wanted (please see above).
> I.e., user(s) would like to build a kernel without LED support at all.
>
> Can you make it a build option?
>
> thanks.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
