On 10/14/20 1:31 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 07/10/2020 14:22, Lukasz Luba wrote:
The thermal cooling device specified in DT might be instantiated for
a thermal zone trip point with a limited set of OPPs to operate on. This
configuration should be supported by Intelligent Power Allocation (IPA),
since it is a standard for other governors. Change the code and allow IPA
to get power value of lower and upper bound set for a given cooling
device.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.l...@arm.com>
---
  drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c | 6 ++++--
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c 
b/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c
index dd59085f38f5..f9ee7787b325 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c
@@ -96,7 +96,8 @@ static u32 estimate_sustainable_power(struct 
thermal_zone_device *tz)
                if (instance->trip != params->trip_max_desired_temperature)
                        continue;
- if (power_actor_get_min_power(cdev, tz, &min_power))
+               if (cdev->ops->state2power(cdev, tz, instance->upper,
+                                          &min_power))

        if (cdev->ops->state2power && cdev->ops->state2power(cdev, tz,
                                                        instance->upper,
                                                        &min_power))

?


Yes, worth to check. I had this in [1] and missed it here while playing
with re-base of these patch series and other test branches.

I will send v2 with the needed cdev_is_power_actor() check.


                        continue;
sustainable_power += min_power;
@@ -404,7 +405,8 @@ static int allocate_power(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
weighted_req_power[i] = frac_to_int(weight * req_power[i]); - if (power_actor_get_max_power(cdev, tz, &max_power[i]))
+               if (cdev->ops->state2power(cdev, tz, instance->lower,
+                                          &max_power[i]))
                        continue;

Same here ?

Inside that loop we check (just a few lines above):

                if (!cdev_is_power_actor(cdev))
                        continue;

then we call this:

                if (cdev->ops->state2power(cdev, tz, instance->lower,
                                        &max_power[i]))

So it should be safe.


                total_req_power += req_power[i];




Thank you Daniel for reviewing this.

Regards,
Lukasz

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20201008170426.465-3-lukasz.l...@arm.com/

Reply via email to