On 14/10/2020 12:16, Jiri Olsa wrote:
My thought was that since the kernel part needs acceptance first [0], which
is based on v5.9-rc7, I would just use the same baseline here.

However I suppose I should still use Arnaldo's perf/core from now on as
baseline, so I'll look at that now.
yes please, I can't already apply 2nd patch..

        patching file pmu-events/jevents.c
        Hunk #1 succeeded at 82 with fuzz 2 (offset 29 lines).
        Hunk #2 FAILED at 335.
        Hunk #3 FAILED at 354.
        Hunk #4 succeeded at 406 (offset 22 lines).
        Hunk #5 FAILED at 439.
        Hunk #6 FAILED at 531.
        Hunk #7 FAILED at 555.
        Hunk #8 FAILED at 602.
        Hunk #9 FAILED at 698.
        Hunk #10 succeeded at 770 (offset 2 lines).
        Hunk #11 succeeded at 813 (offset 2 lines).
        Hunk #12 succeeded at 1075 (offset 2 lines).
        Hunk #13 succeeded at 1242 (offset 2 lines).
        Hunk #14 succeeded at 1273 (offset 2 lines).
        7 out of 14 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file 
pmu-events/jevents.c.rej
        can't find file to patch at input line 439

OK, so I already did the rebase and it was quite straightforward - the conflicts came with the recent changes in jevents.

I will send out soon.

Thanks,
John

Reply via email to