On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 01:07:47PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 12:42:54PM -0700, ira.we...@intel.com wrote:
> > +static inline void pks_update_protection(int pkey, unsigned long
> > protection)
> > +{
> > + current->thread.saved_pkrs = update_pkey_val(current->thread.saved_pkrs,
> > + pkey, protection);
> > + preempt_disable();
> > + write_pkrs(current->thread.saved_pkrs);
> > + preempt_enable();
> > +}
>
> write_pkrs() already disables preemption itself. Wrapping it in yet
> another layer is useless.
I was thinking the update to saved_pkrs needed this protection as well and that
was to be included in the preemption disable. But that too is incorrect.
I've removed this preemption disable.
Thanks,
Ira
