* Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > so there's no forced need to use -rt. > > Ah, forgotten about that. > > Unfortunately the latency tracer patch doesn't compile either: > > CC kernel/latency_trace.o > kernel/latency_trace.c:28:21: error: asm/rtc.h: No such file or directory > kernel/latency_trace.c:63:3: error: #error Implement cycles_to_usecs. > kernel/latency_trace.c: In function ???____trace???: > kernel/latency_trace.c:658: error: implicit declaration of function > ???irqs_disabled_flags??? > make[1]: *** [kernel/latency_trace.o] Error 1
hm, just fill those functions in - should be fairly trivial and we can carry those patches in -rt. (I'd suggest to create an empty asm-um/rtc.h stub as well, for consistency.) Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/