On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 04:45:58PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
> +void mv88e6123_serdes_get_regs(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port, void 
> *_p)
> +{
> +     u16 *p = _p;
> +     u16 reg;
> +     int i;
> +
> +     if (mv88e6xxx_serdes_get_lane(chip, port) == 0)
> +             return;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < 26; i++) {
> +             mv88e6xxx_phy_read(chip, port, i, &reg);

Shouldn't this deal with a failed read in some way, rather than just
assigning the last or possibly uninitialised value to p[i] ?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

Reply via email to