Hi Daniel, Heikki,
Thanks for the patch.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:58:58PM +0100, Daniel Scally wrote:
> From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.kroge...@linux.intel.com>
>
> This implements the remaining .graph_* callbacks in the
> fwnode operations vector for the software nodes. That makes
> the fwnode_graph*() functions available in the drivers also
> when software nodes are used.
>
> The implementation tries to mimic the "OF graph" as much as
> possible, but there is no support for the "reg" device
> property. The ports will need to have the index in their
> name which starts with "port" (for example "port0", "port1",
> ...) and endpoints will use the index of the software node
> that is given to them during creation. The port nodes can
> also be grouped under a specially named "ports" subnode,
> just like in DT, if necessary.
>
> The remote-endpoints are reference properties under the
> endpoint nodes that are named "remote-endpoint".
>
> Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.kroge...@linux.intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Daniel Scally <djrsca...@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrsca...@gmail.com>
> ---
> changes in v3:
> - removed software_node_device_is_available
> - moved the change to software_node_get_next_child to a separate
> patch
> - switched to use fwnode_handle_put() in graph_get_next_endpoint()
> instead of software_node_put()
>
> changes in v2:
> - added software_node_device_is_available
> - altered software_node_get_next_child to get references
> - altered software_node_get_next_endpoint to release references
> to ports and avoid passing invalid combinations of swnodes to
> software_node_get_next_child
> - altered swnode_graph_find_next_port to release port rather than
> old
> drivers/base/swnode.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 119 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/swnode.c b/drivers/base/swnode.c
> index 741149b90..3732530ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/swnode.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/swnode.c
> @@ -536,6 +536,120 @@ software_node_get_reference_args(const struct
> fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static struct fwnode_handle *
> +swnode_graph_find_next_port(const struct fwnode_handle *parent,
> + struct fwnode_handle *port)
> +{
> + struct fwnode_handle *old = port;
> +
> + while ((port = software_node_get_next_child(parent, old))) {
software_node_get_next_child() doesn't drop the reference of the old child
nor gets a reference to the returned node. Should it?
The function to get a named child node does.
It'd be nice if this was aligned. Or am I missing something?
This isn't really a comment on this patch though.
--
Kind regards,
Sakari Ailus
