On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 10:33:12AM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote: > That doesn't feel like a big loss: if a malicious hypervisor wanted to > induce completely random code execution, it can do that anyway by just > messing with the guest-to-host translation, no?
Yes, but relying on defined behavior is still better. Undefined behavior
could also mean it jumps to some other code which then leaks data.
Regards,
Joerg
