Hi,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 08:54:21AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:20:17 +0200 Maxime Ripard <max...@cerno.tech> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 02:56:37PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the sunxi tree got a conflict in:
> > >
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a100.dtsi
> > >
> > > between commit:
> > >
> > > 0dea1794f3b4 ("arm64: allwinner: A100: add the basical Allwinner A100
> > > DTSI file")
> > >
> > > from the arm-soc tree and commit:
> > >
> > > 7e66a778cb8b ("arm64: allwinner: A100: add the basical Allwinner A100
> > > DTSI file")
> > >
> > > from the sunxi tree.
> > >
> > > These are 2 versions of the same patch. For now I am just using the
> > > version in the arm-soc tree ... please sort this out.
> >
> > The branch in arm-soc has a build breakage (that doesn't happen in
> > linux-next since the clk tree has the commit to fix it) so I sent a new
> > PR
> >
> > Once that PR is in arm-soc, I guess that merge issue will go away
>
> I am still getting the same conflict (but between Linus' tree and the
> sunxi tree). It looks like the sunxi tree has not been updated since
> October 6 ...Yeah, the PR has never been picked up by arm-soc. I've pushed a new branch based on 5.10-rc1 on our repo, it should solve the conflict. Sorry for the inconvenience Maxime
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
