On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 05:16:28PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Greg KH wrote: > > > Ok, how about this function. If it errors out, it is free to just call > > kfree() on the kobject. Seems simple enough to me, any objections? If > > not, I'll go through and fix up the whole tree... > > Looks good, _provided_ you also get rid of kobject_register(). Which > you pretty much would have to do anyway, since it doesn't accept the > ktype or the name as an argument.
Yes, I would do that at the same time. Well, not at the _exact_ same time, it might take a few patches to get there :) thanks for the review, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
