On 27/10/2020 11:05, David Howells wrote: > Colin King <colin.k...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> @@ -606,7 +605,7 @@ void afs_unuse_cell(struct afs_net *net, struct afs_cell >> *cell, enum afs_cell_tr >> >> u = atomic_read(&cell->ref); >> a = atomic_dec_return(&cell->active); >> - trace_afs_cell(debug_id, u, a, reason); >> + trace_afs_cell(cell->debug_id, u, a, reason); > > It's probably better to read cell->debug_id before calling > atomic_dec_return(). > > I have a patch for this based on a report by Dan Carpenter, so no need to send > a revised patch.
OK - thanks David > > Thanks, > David >
