From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 1af9270e908cd50a4f5d815c9b6f794c7d57ed07 ]

>From the checks and commit messages for modify_return, it seems it was
never the intention that it should be possible to attach a tracing program
with expected_attach_type == BPF_MODIFY_RETURN to another BPF program.
However, check_attach_modify_return() will only look at the function name,
so if the target function starts with "security_", the attach will be
allowed even for bpf2bpf attachment.

Fix this oversight by also blocking the modification if a target program is
supplied.

Fixes: 18644cec714a ("bpf: Fix use-after-free in fmod_ret check")
Fixes: 6ba43b761c41 ("bpf: Attachment verification for BPF_MODIFY_RETURN")
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index fba52d9ec8fc4..5b9d2cf06fc6b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -11046,6 +11046,11 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env 
*env)
                }
 
                if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_MODIFY_RETURN) {
+                       if (tgt_prog) {
+                               verbose(env, "can't modify return codes of BPF 
programs\n");
+                               ret = -EINVAL;
+                               goto out;
+                       }
                        ret = check_attach_modify_return(prog, addr);
                        if (ret)
                                verbose(env, "%s() is not modifiable\n",
-- 
2.25.1



Reply via email to