On 11/30/07, Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 04:33:19PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > > This patch fixes s390 dependency for x86 > > > > Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Deleting random parts of the kernel tree is actually not > supported. >
I agree with you. I just did this to same some space because I keep many kernel trees. But i am curious if other arch do not depends on x86 then s390 ? > > diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig > > index 1330061..b699ed5 100644 > > --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig > > @@ -537,4 +537,6 @@ source "security/Kconfig" > > > > source "crypto/Kconfig" > > > > +source "arch/s390/crypto/Kconfig" > > + > > With this there's no dependency on CRYPTO_HW anymore. > Anyhow "if CRYPTO_HW" is not working in drivers/crypto/Kconfig have you tested this patch on S390. Is this giving errors ? And you can also add depends with CRYPTO_HW in arch/s390/crypto/Kconfig Thank you, Jaswinder Singh. > > +#ifdef CONFIG_S390 > > #include "../arch/s390/appldata/appldata.h" > > +#endif > > This include can go away. > > Since this pops up again and again we'll come up with a patch to fix this. > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
