On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:12:02 -0400
Tony Krowiak <akrow...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> +static ssize_t guest_matrix_show(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + ssize_t nchars;
> + struct mdev_device *mdev = mdev_from_dev(dev);
> + struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = mdev_get_drvdata(mdev);
> +
> + if (!vfio_ap_mdev_has_crycb(matrix_mdev))
> + return -ENODEV;
I'm wondering, would it make sense to have guest_matrix display the would
be guest matrix when we don't have a KVM? With the filtering in
place, the question in what guest_matrix would my (assign) matrix result
right now if I were to hook up my vfio_ap_mdev to a guest seems a
legitimate one.
> +
> + mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
> + nchars = vfio_ap_mdev_matrix_show(&matrix_mdev->shadow_apcb, buf);
> + mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
> +
> + return nchars;
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(guest_matrix);
