On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 9:30 AM Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.ker...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <will...@google.com>
Thanks for your ack! > Should this go to net if a bugfix though? Yes, this should theoretically be a bug fix. But I didn't think this was an important fix, because af_packet.c already had workarounds for this issue for all drivers that didn't have header_ops. We can separate this patch to make it go to "net" though, but I'm afraid that this will cause merging conflicts between "net" and "net-next".
