From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

commit 13bd691421bc191a402d2e0d3da5f248d170a632 upstream.

Once we've copied some data for an iocb that is marked with IOCB_WAITQ,
we should no longer attempt to async lock a new page. Instead make sure
we return the copied amount, and let the caller retry, instead of
returning -EIOCBQUEUED for a new page.

This should only be possible with read-ahead disabled on the below
device, and multiple threads racing on the same file. Haven't been able
to reproduce on anything else.

Cc: [email protected] # v5.9
Fixes: 1a0a7853b901 ("mm: support async buffered reads in 
generic_file_buffered_read()")
Reported-by: Kent Overstreet <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 mm/filemap.c |    8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -2179,6 +2179,14 @@ ssize_t generic_file_buffered_read(struc
        last_index = (*ppos + iter->count + PAGE_SIZE-1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
        offset = *ppos & ~PAGE_MASK;
 
+       /*
+        * If we've already successfully copied some data, then we
+        * can no longer safely return -EIOCBQUEUED. Hence mark
+        * an async read NOWAIT at that point.
+        */
+       if (written && (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_WAITQ))
+               iocb->ki_flags |= IOCB_NOWAIT;
+
        for (;;) {
                struct page *page;
                pgoff_t end_index;


Reply via email to