+ ath10k list

John Stultz <[email protected]> writes:

> Allow the qcom_scm driver to be loadable as a permenent module.
>
> This still uses the "depends on QCOM_SCM || !QCOM_SCM" bit to
> ensure that drivers that call into the qcom_scm driver are
> also built as modules. While not ideal in some cases its the
> only safe way I can find to avoid build errors without having
> those drivers select QCOM_SCM and have to force it on (as
> QCOM_SCM=n can be valid for those drivers).
>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
> Cc: Andy Gross <[email protected]>
> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jason Cooper <[email protected]>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
> Cc: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
> Cc: Kalle Valo <[email protected]>
> Cc: Maulik Shah <[email protected]>
> Cc: Lina Iyer <[email protected]>
> Cc: Saravana Kannan <[email protected]>
> Cc: Todd Kjos <[email protected]>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <[email protected]>
> ---
> v3:
> * Fix __arm_smccc_smc build issue reported by
>   kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> v4:
> * Add "depends on QCOM_SCM || !QCOM_SCM" bit to ath10k
>   config that requires it.
> v5:
> * Fix QCOM_QCM typo in Kconfig, it should be QCOM_SCM
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/Kconfig                | 4 ++--
>  drivers/firmware/Makefile               | 3 ++-
>  drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c             | 4 ++++
>  drivers/iommu/Kconfig                   | 2 ++
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig | 1 +
>  5 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

For ath10k part:

Acked-by: Kalle Valo <[email protected]>

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Reply via email to