On 11/2/20 7:12 PM, Tom Rix wrote:
>
> On 11/1/20 10:51 PM, kajoljain wrote:
>>
>> On 10/31/20 7:18 PM, t...@redhat.com wrote:
>>> From: Tom Rix <t...@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> A semicolon is not needed after a switch statement.
>> Hi Tom,
>> I was checking this patch. Not sure if it will come under as fix patch.
>> Since this is not fixing
>> any logical issue do we still need to add fix tag?
>
> My rule of thumb is a fix means the kernel needs to be recompiled.
Yes make sense. Thanks for confirming.
Thanks,
Kajol Jain
>
> This isn't a fix.
>
> Tom
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kajol Jain
>>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <t...@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
>>> b/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
>>> index cd6b8d4f2335..afb892e7ffc6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
>>> @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static const char *mspro_block_attr_name(unsigned char
>>> tag)
>>> return "attr_devinfo";
>>> default:
>>> return NULL;
>>> - };
>>> + }
>>> }
>>>
>>> typedef ssize_t (*sysfs_show_t)(struct device *dev,
>>>
>
