On Dec 4, 2007 4:20 PM, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 03:53:15PM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > > On Dec 4, 2007 3:46 PM, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 02:45:47PM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Does the KOBJ_NAME_LEN really means the limit of kobject name length? > > > > seems > > > > not . And if it's true, is the KOBJ_NAME_LEN of 20 enough to use? > > > > > > No, not anymore, the kobject name is totally dynamic. > > > > Eh, Why does this macro still exist? If KOBJ_NAME_LEN is really > > needed, maybe it should be renamed to something else to avoid > > misleading. > > Right now other .h files use it also. It isn't hurting anything for > now, and Kay has some patches he is working on to get rid of the static > bus_id array, which will then let us get rid of that define entirely. >
Good to know, thanks! > thanks, > > greg k-h > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
