On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 12:43 PM George Cherian <gcher...@marvell.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Willem,
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.ker...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2020 7:21 PM
> > To: George Cherian <gcher...@marvell.com>
> > Cc: Network Development <net...@vger.kernel.org>; linux-kernel <linux-
> > ker...@vger.kernel.org>; Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org>; David Miller
> > <da...@davemloft.net>; Sunil Kovvuri Goutham
> > <sgout...@marvell.com>; Linu Cherian <lcher...@marvell.com>;
> > Geethasowjanya Akula <gak...@marvell.com>; masahi...@kernel.org
> > Subject: [EXT] Re: [net-next PATCH 2/3] octeontx2-af: Add devlink health
> > reporters for NPA
> >
> > External Email
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > static int rvu_devlink_info_get(struct devlink *devlink, struct
> > > > devlink_info_req *req,
> > > > > struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) { @@
> > > > > -53,7 +483,8 @@ int rvu_register_dl(struct rvu *rvu)
> > > > > rvu_dl->dl = dl;
> > > > > rvu_dl->rvu = rvu;
> > > > > rvu->rvu_dl = rvu_dl;
> > > > > - return 0;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return rvu_health_reporters_create(rvu);
> > > >
> > > > when would this be called with rvu->rvu_dl == NULL?
> > >
> > > During initialization.
> >
> > This is the only caller, and it is only reached if rvu_dl is non-zero.
>
> Did you mean to ask, where is it de-initialized?
> If so, it should be done in rvu_unregister_dl() after freeing rvu_dl.
No, I meant that rvu_health_reporters_create does not need an
!rvu->rvu_dl precondition test, as the only callers calls with with a
non-zero rvu_dl.
