Liu, thank you very much for the fix.

Please note that I posted a patch series on October, 28th including
this fix. Also note that I posted a v2 today.

Khalil 

> Subject: [PATCH] i2c: mlxbf: Fix build error with CONFIG_ACPI disabled
> 
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxbf.c: In function ‘mlxbf_i2c_acpi_probe’:
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxbf.c:2296:8: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘acpi_device_uid’; did you mean ‘cpu_device_up’? [-Werror=implicit-
> function-declaration]
>   uid = acpi_device_uid(adev);
>         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>         cpu_device_up
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxbf.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxbf.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxbf.c
> index ee59e0da082d..cd8a909431a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxbf.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxbf.c
> @@ -2272,6 +2272,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id
> mlxbf_i2c_acpi_ids[] = {
> 
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, mlxbf_i2c_acpi_ids);
> 
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>  static int mlxbf_i2c_acpi_probe(struct device *dev, struct mlxbf_i2c_priv
> *priv)
>  {
>       const struct acpi_device_id *aid;
> @@ -2305,6 +2306,12 @@ static int mlxbf_i2c_acpi_probe(struct device
> *dev, struct mlxbf_i2c_priv *priv)
> 
>       return ret;
>  }
> +#else
> +static int mlxbf_i2c_acpi_probe(struct device *dev, struct mlxbf_i2c_priv
> *priv)
> +{
> +     return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +#endif
> 
>  static int mlxbf_i2c_of_probe(struct device *dev, struct mlxbf_i2c_priv
> *priv)
>  {
> --
> 2.25.1

Reply via email to